green-syringeVaccines which have been approved by the responsible government authorities for vaccination against the alleged H1N1 Influenza A Swine Flu have been found to contain nano particles. Vaccine makers have been experimenting with nanoparticles as a way to “turbo charge” vaccines for several years. Now it has come out that the vaccines approved for use in Germany and other European countries contain nanoparticles in a form that reportedly attacks healthy cells and can be deadly.
In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) announced in an article in the journal, Nature Biotechnology, that they had developed  a “nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies.” The article went on to describe the effects of their breakthrough: “At a mere 25 nanometers, these particles are so tiny that once injected, they flow through the skin’s extracellular matrix, making a beeline to the lymph nodes. Within minutes, they’ve reached a concentration of DCs thousands of times greater than in the skin. The immune response can then be extremely strong and effective.” 1

There is only one small problem with vaccines containing nanoparticles—they can be deadly and at the least cause severe irreparable health damage.

Nanoparticles, promoted in the mass media as the new wonder revolution of science, are particles that have been produced vastly smaller than deadly asbestos particles which caused severe lung damage and death before being outlawed. Particles at a nano size, (nm = 0,000000001 Meter) fuse together with the membranes of our body cell membranes and, according to recent studies in China and Japan, continuously destroy cells once introduced into the body. Once they interact with the body’s cellular structure, they cannot be removed. Modern medicine euphemistically terms the phenomenon, a continuing infectious reaction.

Since the asbestos scandal, it has been established that particles in size a millionth of a meter, because of their enormous attractive force, penetrate all cells, destroying all those they come into contact with. Nanoparticles are far smaller than asbestos fibers.

Beijing Tests confirm deadly effects on humans

The fact that WHO, the European Medicines Evaluation Agency, the German Robert Koch Institute and other health bodies today would permit the population to be injected with largely untested novel vaccines containing nanoparticles says more about the powerful pharma lobby in Euiropean politics than it does about the sanity or moral integrity of the civil servants responsible for health of the general public.

The September 2009 issue of the respected European Respiratory Journal, made public on 19 August, and available since 21 August online, contains a peer-reviewed article with the title, “Exposure to nanoparticles is related to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma.”

The article describes tests carried out in 2008 at the elite Beijing Chaoyang Hospital on seven young women. All seven, ages 18-47 had been exposed to nanoparticles for 5–13 months in their common workplace. All were admitted to the hospital with shortness of breath and pleural effusions, or excessive fluids surrounding the lungs, inhibiting breathing. None of the seven had ever smoked and none were in any special risk group. Doctors carefully tested for every possibility and confirmed that the lung problems had a common origin—regular inhalation of nanoparticles in their factory. They had been exposed to Polyacrylat nanoparticles.

The tests confirmed the nanoparticles had set off a “super-meltdown” reaction in the patients. Despite all heroic efforts of doctors, two of the seven died from the lung complications. 2

In their report, the scientists concluded something so alarming it is necessary to quote at length:

“Immunological tests, examinations of bacteriology, virology and tumour markers, bronchoscopy, internal thoracoscopy and video-assisted thoracic surgery were performed. Surveys of the workplace, clinical observations and examinations of the patients were conducted. Polyacrylate, consisting of nanoparticles, was confirmed in the workplace. Pathological examinations of patients’ lung tissue displayed nonspecific pulmonary inflammation, pulmonary fibrosis and foreign-body granulomas of pleura. Using transmission electron microscopy, nanoparticles were observed to lodge in the cytoplasm and caryoplasm of pulmonary epithelial and mesothelial cells, but are also located in the chest fluid. These cases arouse concern that long-term exposure to some nanoparticles without protective measures may be related to serious damage to human lungs.“3

To date Animal studies and in vitro experiments show that nanoparticles can result in lung damage and other toxicity in animals, but no reports on the clinical toxicity in humans due to nanoparticles prior to the Beijing study had been made.

The Beijing Chaoyang Hospital study has now conclusively confirmed that nanoparticles cause lung damage and other toxicity in humans as well. At this point in time, when two of the approved vaccines planned to be mass distributed in Germany and elsewhere contain nanoparticles, failure of the relevant responsible public health and epidemiology officials to order an immediate emergency freeze on distribution of any vaccine containing nanoparticles can only be considered tantamount to criminal negligence. Hopefully the responsible authorities will react in time to avert a possible human health catastrophe orders of magnitude worse than the worst case of Swine Flu reported to date.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15092

Comments

25 Responses to “Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines”

  1. darrell on September 18th, 2009 10:52 pm

    sounds like population control has started

    [Reply]

    Barbara Reply:

    It really is a no-brainer that we need to change our lifestyles if we want to survive on planet Earth. But why should a few bureaucrats decide that the best way to fix the problem is to use manmade diseases? They hyped up the so-called epidemic very well. If they used those same resources to get people to live greener lives, discourage having lots of children, etc, I have enough faith in humans that we would drastically change our lifestyles to save our planet.

    But I object to the WHO, government bureaucrats, Illuminati, CDC, FDA, etc to make decisions deciding that we should play disease roulette with the population of the world to reduce numbers that way. I object to the vaccine manufacturers having SECRET INGREDIENTS allowed by law in their products that they want to inject into me and my children. And, yes, that is an accurate statement. Drugs and medicines in the USA are allowed secret ingredients (such as peanut oil). And the government LIES to us - fabricating statistics on the flu, not to protect the public, but to promote flu shots because that is what they see as their job. Dr. Mouden has PROOF that vaccinations are causing mini-strokes in our children (ADHD, autism), I found proof that vaccine ingredients are the direct cause of food allergies. The bacteria is grown on FOOD WASTE! Every food oil known to man can be mixed together and used as a diluent and it does not have to appear on the package insert! I am looking at this swine flu epidemic as a blessing because I have never seen so many people beginning to talk about how government is no longer representing us as it is supposed to be. Finally, more people are becoming aware and paying attention to the police state laws being passed and the trashing of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights by “their” government. (I can’t say “MY” government because it is OBVIOUS that Washington DC doesn’t represent my interests or yours.)

    [Reply]

    Ken Reply:

    Amen

    [Reply]

  2. Gary E. Andrews on September 19th, 2009 8:04 am

    It sounds like the victims of nanoparticle poisoning would display much the same symptoms as they will with influenza disease. None are likely to have the electron-microscopic autopsy that would reveal the difference. We live in an age of low-quality decision-making by ‘leaders’ who are instudious about the cause and effect of their decisions, in government, in commerce, in ‘leading’ their own lives. We, the people, are totally at the mercy of these mis-leaders who trust too much, push for profit over safety, ignore science, serve greed and even serve fascist agendas. Because of our global interconnectedness, the decisions of one group which has risen to power through deception and subterfuge, such as WHO, the US Government or any other, a pharmaceutical or food company, can affect the safety and health security of any and all other humans on planet Earth. Thanks for keeping an eye on them. Good luck to us. These threats to survival exceed all others. Man, these men, and women, are the most likely force to succeed in extermination of the human race.

    [Reply]

    Craig Blacklock Reply:

    While I generally agree with the comment above. By far the largest threat to the human race is overpopulation. No plague or war has ever had a significant effect on global population numbers. We are now at least three times a sustainable level, and heading for certain disaster. Yes, the nano-particles pose a potential threat we should study and be aware of. But we know with out a doubt that we will be running out of resources such as petroleum, fossil aquifers, top soil, and other non-renewable essentials, just as our population peaks at 9 to 12 billion. The only sane reaction to this is to voluntarily limit ourselves to no more than one child per couple on a global scale.

    [Reply]

  3. Cindy on September 19th, 2009 9:11 am

    In the beginning I was pretty confident that if forced to take these we could take our chances and do a siufficient detox. I guess they are a step ahead of us on that one. and the fact that they have now found something that will look like the flu. To those who do not know better it is no longer the vaccine is dangerous but wow this flu is so powerful even the vaccine isn’t effective against it. You know, this is no accident or ignorance. Something this cold and well thought out can be no less than intentional mass extermination.

    [Reply]

  4. Taza Guthrie on September 19th, 2009 10:43 am

    This is exactly why strengthening the immune system is so important. There are many articles available to help individuals who wish to do so.

    [Reply]

  5. Valerie on September 19th, 2009 11:03 am

    I will not participate in the flu vaccine until the nanoparticles are taken out of the vaccine.
    I also agree that our government has turned into a fascist, socialistic, greedy, power hunger Government. I’m so afraid of what they are doing to this USA that I will fight against this with my last breath.
    There are a lot of out there that feel the same way and now are awakening to what is going on … Thank you for bring this information to all of us.
    Valerie

    [Reply]

  6. Rich Cree on September 19th, 2009 12:02 pm

    I have worked with researchers doing work with Gold nanoparticles that act as carriers for chemicals that neutralize the effect of chemical warfare agents for the military and for overdoses of anesthetics during surgery. In discussions with these researchers, it was understood that to clear the kidneys naturally, the Gold nanoparticles had to be less than 10 nanometers in size. For the medical market, the Gold nanoparticles had to be less than 100 nanometers and had to be dialyzed out of the blood stream. If they are using 25 nanometer particles in the vaccine, I can only assume that these particles will permanently be in the body until some dialysis is performed—which does not seem likely.

    As far as Chinese studies, I would point out that this is a inhalation study not an injection study. Yes, asbestos did effect cell function in small sizes, but different types of asbestos were more toxic due to needle-like structure versus curly fibers that did not puncture the cell as easily and curly fibers could be more easily cleaned out of the lungs. I guess nano carbon fibers being considered for composite reinformcements seem to have the same cell killing capabilities because of the needle like structure. It may be more of the nano particle size and shape that creates the hazardous effects—but I wonder why a 25 nanometer particle would be used when there has been extensive research on Gold nanoparticles at less than 10 nanometers easily clearing from the body through the kidneys.

    [Reply]

  7. Jacqui on September 19th, 2009 12:46 pm

    Beautifully put…..and I second it…….

    We must take control of our lives !

    [Reply]

    christine ward Reply:

    its global genacide,and the world bankers are behind it aka rockerfeller et cetra .

    [Reply]

  8. ellie jensen on September 20th, 2009 12:40 am

    I am confused by your article. I am against all vaccines but what does the nanoparticles in china that were airborn have to do with the flu vaccine nanoparticles. Are you saying any substance that is made so small to penetrate the body is bad? There are face and wrinkle creams out there with nana technology to help the moisture products penetrate the skin cells…is this a deadly thing to do? Thanks for your reply…Ellie

    [Reply]

  9. Darrin on September 20th, 2009 3:59 pm

    Craig Blacklock you hit the nail on head. This started with certain religions making it a sin to not over procreate. I live in Utah where OVER breedind is not only demanded of the local predominant religion, IT IS REWARDED!! They pay NO taxes and their 6-20+ child families are over burdening the schools and many other systems. WHO PAYS THEIR BILL? People with one or two children or NO children…nothing against kids, I have 3 but they are kinda like rats. ANYTHING GOING AROUND cold or flu wise, they bring it right home..lol, same with lice. There was a HUGE out btreak and the school system felt it wasn’t necessary to let parents in on this.. f’N EXCUSE ME???!!! You can link MOST pandemic problems to over population… until one African tribe, which is a shockingly prolific eample of the damage being frightened into thinking you’re going burn in H E DOUBLE HOCKEY STICKS if you DON’T over breed. This particular intance whom will remain nameless had a head quarters so big it is it’s own country and so wealthy that tiny piece of land is more wealthy than everyone else in the world COMBINED!
    And this isn’t anything new, in the early 20th century they killed 200,000+ people with a vaccine. By %’s that translates to two million plus who will die ffrom this vaccine. Big pharma has ONE AGENDA, and that is profiteering and high dividends to stock holders. This has been the case from day one. Even small pharma has the same agenda. They could care less about health, it IS about money… YUP! ONE OF THE SEVEN DEADLY SINS…….GREED!…. Do you reakize if every one who wee taking pills cut out what they don’t really need and used alternatives If we all did this… went natural we could break their pirate backs easily.. same with big oil…cut out ALL unnecessary travel, stay home on holiday weekends and throw block parties.. When the economy imploded we were forces to cut back and gasoline went down $1.50-$2.00 a gallon almost over night.. it’s down and the superfluous driving is back driving prices up again.. STAY HOME EVEN IF IT GOES DOWN TO 59 CENTS A GALLON… This is call passive resistance and it works… next major holiday stay home, encourage everyone you know to stay home.. keep cuttin back despite tempting price drops and “WE THE PEOPLE” will be in control…

    [Reply]

  10. Anastacia on September 20th, 2009 4:17 pm

    This is the first conformation that I have seen on the Nanotechnologies being used in lab flu. I received information about this a couple of months ago and the word comes from a good source that the nanotechnologies are being use for mind control. Believe what you will one thing is for sure, the vaccines are dirty and dangerous!

    [Reply]

  11. John Best on September 20th, 2009 7:07 pm

    Nanoparticles of what?

    [Reply]

  12. bev on September 22nd, 2009 8:34 pm

    I hear a good question! I am supposing that whatever is negative in this vaccine could be made so that it is super absorbable into your cells, making it that much more dangerous. I’d like to say, regarding overpopulation, God is not ignorant like man, he said populate the earth, not try to control it…as a matter of fact, he became rather pissed off when someone was counting the population. He is the same yesterday, today and in the future. He is always the same. He put plenty for us all to harvest and use. We need to find a way to put the skids on the greedy people who are perpetrating this on us. He did not create shortages, we do.

    [Reply]

  13. barb on September 23rd, 2009 8:38 am

    So… what are we to do?

    1. This may sound odd to many of you but visualize the world as we want it to be. See it. Believe in it. Meditate on it.

    2. Refuse to participate in the vaccination madness. We do not believe in vaccines and we believe in the rights that the Constitution and Bill of Rights gave us. Refuse no matter what. We really have nothing to lose if we refuse because we WILL lose if we allow it. If you work in the medical industry…. I feel very sorry for you. I could not with a clear conscious vaccinate someone else with these toxins. Start looking for a new job. How can you with a clear conscious vaccinate a child when you KNOW that you are causing that child to have a ministroke…. food allergies …. autism ….. ADHD ….

    3. Educate as many people as you can. Don’t start in immediately with the government has become Nazi or anything like that. If they have allergies… tell them that you read a very convincing study connecting vaccinations with allergies. If they have asthma, tell them that many of our common medicines have side effects that are identical to asthma. Tell them just enough for them to be curious and start doubting the stupidity of the swine flu vaccine. How could a vaccine manufacturer patent a vaccine 2 years before anyone ever gets sick with it? Help your friends start to use their brains and think clearly. We truly have been brainwashed. It will take alot for people to realize that “American Way of Modern Medicine” that many believed in (it really is a religion and not science….) has used us as guinea pigs and intends to keep us continuously sick and now worse….

    4. As more and more people wake up from the brainwashed sleep they have been in, our world that we visualized will start to happen. We do it one person at a time. This may seem like a drop in the bucket but it is the old pyramid scheme in action. Each person awakens two more. It won’t take long to have millions of people starting to think for themselves. Keep repeating the truth. Repeating lies has worked to convince many people that the government is doing this to help us. We need to repeat the truth as often as you have an opportunity to do so. Speak up. This is no time to be part of a silent majority unless you want to be part of the dead or slave population.

    [Reply]

  14. Jean on September 23rd, 2009 9:31 am

    What’s one to believe? This, which sounds more like a Conspiracy Theory than real science, OR the supposed evil government? I really feel for those who distrust, but can’t believe that all humans in leadership positions are “greedy” or bent on exterminating other humans. There are those who never take flu vaccines either because they’ve had some reaction (similar to the flu) or because they fear some reaction. Who’s to say that those who refuse to take this vaccine aren’t risking their own lives or spreading it to others? What to believe?

    [Reply]

  15. Ken P. on September 25th, 2009 7:27 am

    I trust that this article is factual but it makes apples and oranges comparisons and concludes that injected nano-particles in vaccines will kill us because inhaled nano-particles killed a couple of ladies. My only problem is that lungs handle things differently than other parts of the body. It’s like saying that because a number of people got water in their lungs and died (drowned) that it’s a big conspiracy that we are told we should drink water everyday. I know someone who got aspiration pneumonia when he choked on some food and it killed him. That doesn’t mean that we should stop eating food because inhaled food can kill us.

    I don’t know if nano-particles are good, bad, or indifferent. But I do know that I don’t like articles that seem to try to scare me based on invalid comparisons.

    [Reply]

  16. soulshine on September 25th, 2009 3:22 pm

    Barb,
    Thank you for telling the truth this is what is happening now!!!….This virus and many others were made in a lab by humans. I have never taken a vaccine and never will and am happy and healthy. “BE THE CHANGE YOU WISH TO SEE IN THE WORLD”. Use your brain to see the truth of what is happening on our world. The truth about this and other similar lies are all about to be exposed. Thank you Barb for your amazing and valuable information, and Jason this IS the Truth!!!!!…We all need to wake up to the higher truth and stop being mental slaves!!!

    [Reply]

    Tammy Reply:

    What if there wasn’t a Polio vaccine, measles, etc… How many people would be dead or crippled by the diseases we have come to know as history? I have a child that is not healthy and this new flu could affect her, maybe kill her (as with a small % of the new vaccine) I think everyone should stop and think about the benefits of the H1N1 vaccine. I am all for vacinations.

    [Reply]

  17. Mr. AC on September 26th, 2009 10:08 pm

    Well, I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again… you can all waste your time pissing and moaning about the Big Machine, or you can f-ing armed (while you can) and pop a cap on anyone trying to force feed you anything. You have the right to defend yourself with deadly force if YOU feel your life is threatened, (not IS threatened) and I think deadly vaccines qualify.
    At any rate, at a MINIMUM, you should really spend time getting healthy and support health systems that help people instead of posioning them and making them dependent… like Chinese Medicine, which is based on PREVENTION.
    Or… you can continue to piss and moan like impotent weenies, and argue with [geniuses] (self-censored) on here who bite the big pharma-cockadooledoo
    -Ja nai

    [Reply]

  18. JIM on September 30th, 2009 4:26 pm

    wasn’t warfare one of the principal reasons governments invested in drug science ? I’ bet RUSSIA,GERAMANY,U.S.,FRANCE,CHINA,all have a biowarfare dept ?

    [Reply]

  19. greg on October 1st, 2009 4:34 pm

    i have a new born and my pediatrician says i should vaccinate…. all my other children 8,9,13 along my wife and i… both the flu and swine flu….

    why shouldnt i protect my baby? is there proof that it is bad for you?

    [Reply]

  20. Andrew on November 26th, 2009 3:47 pm

    What they forget to mention in this article is that Polyacrylate is dangerous in nanoparticle form or not because of inhalation.

    But plenty of other nanoparticles have been tested and are perfectly safe.

    The facts about the deaths and studies may be true but it is a completely one sided article.

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply