Oct

27

WHO Memos 1972 Explains How to Turn Vaccines into a Means of Killing

Filed Under Big Government, Big Pharma, Pandemic 

biohazardTwo key memorandums from WHO, discovered by Patrick Jordan, prove WHO has intentionally created the three-shot killer vaccine that people in the USA and other countries could soon be forced to take.

1972 WHO Bulletin 47, No 2 Memordanda #1 and #2 Virus-associated immunopathology:

Animal models and implications for human disease * technically outline the ability to create biological weapons in the form of vaccines that:

1) First totally disable the Immune System.

2) Load every cell of the Victim’s body up with Infection.

3) Switch the Immune System on causing the host to kill themselves in a Cytokine Storm.

One, Two, Three, Dead.

These WHO Memorandas describe the three-stage impact of the three “shots” many people will be forced to take this fall to allegedly treat a virus that WHO also helped create and release.

This is a crucial piece of evidence of WHO’s long-term genocidal intentions that could stand in any court of law because these memorandums give the best and fullest explanation WHO’s and affiliated labs (such as the CDC) current activities, such as their patenting of the most lethal bird flu viruses, their sending that virus to Baxter’s subsidiary in Austria, which weaponised it and sent out 72 kilos to 16 labs in four countries almost triggering a global pandemic.

For every crime, there needs to be motive, an indication that it was deliberate, planned. The WHO memorandums provide the evidence of just that deliberate, long-term planning to kill people by weakening their immune system by use of the first vaccine, injecting a live virus into their body by a second, and creating a cytokine storm using squalene in a third.

Download the WHO Memoranda on:

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?iid=169484

Scroll down until you find:

Memoranda

Virus-associated immunopathology : animal models and implications for human disease:

1. Effects of viruses on the immune system, immune-complex diseases, and antibody-mediated immunologic injury

Bull World Health Organ. 1972; 47(2): 257?264.
PMCID: PMC2480894

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=2480894&blobtype=pdf

Virus-associated immunopathology: animal models and implications for human disease:

2. Cell-mediated immunity, autoimmune diseases, genetics, and implications for clinical research

Bull World Health Organ. 1972; 47(2): 265?274
PMCID: PMC2480896

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=2480896&blobtype=pdf
If you find any difficulty please download it from our Download Section : Here

http://www.fightbackh1n1.com/2009/08/who-memos-1972-explains-how-to-turn.html

Comments

9 Responses to “WHO Memos 1972 Explains How to Turn Vaccines into a Means of Killing”

  1. james heartland on October 31st, 2009 9:52 am

    True? Criminal? Actionable? Let’s get serious NOW, and have the Justice Department, the World Court and The UN have their say on it. Now the near-simultaneous appearance and spread of AIDS in Africa and Gay and Lesbian populations where WHO inoculation programs happened make more sense. DON’T drop this!!

    [Reply]

  2. Lori Jacobs on October 31st, 2009 11:16 am

    When do we take them to court? Time is running out for us to act. Do you [Health Freedom Alliance] have any plans to act on this?
    Let’s do something NOW while we still have some vestige of our Constitution!

    [Reply]

  3. marleina ward on October 31st, 2009 12:32 pm

    I thought this was the United States Of America. Little did I know that I am living in Germany with Hitler at the helm to wipe out all those that he did not wish to live. This is the craziest thing I’ve ever heard. I will NOT take ANY shots for ANYthing. You and whatever frigging mouse you have in your evil pocket can NOT force ME to do ANYthing that “I” do NOT want to do. You can take THAT to the BANK. If you don’t like my attitude then SHOOT ME. Marleina Ward….A citizen of what used to be the USA, and a FREE COUNTRY. MAY FREEDOM REST IN PEACE.

    [Reply]

  4. stonecatcher on October 31st, 2009 12:36 pm

    the people who are perpectuating the 3 shot reduction of population have positioned themselves as “gatekeepers” at every important “process point” within the infrastructure of the collective community. the control the judiciary nodes as well–so you would need the acquiesence of these people to litigate this important issue. we must identify the members of this sayanim [locally as well as globally] to break the the apparent impasse [mindlock]. who benefits and why? it’s the self-chosen against the unchosen. it’s that simple.

    [Reply]

  5. Sharrhan on November 1st, 2009 9:33 am

    This is VERY badly written, and quite misleading. Many distorted assumptions are made and the articles jumps to conclusions that are not borne out by the facts.
    Yes, we should be wary of vaccinations, and we should resist being vaccinated. But this article does not begin to adequately back up and validate its claims.
    Why is it that in the 1970s, when it was discovered that the swine flu vaccinations were causing a few too many negative symptoms, the vaccination program was shut down altogether because a small segment of the population reacted unfavorably. This goes against the whole grain of the author’s argument that the government is trying to kill us.
    So far, both the H1N1 and the standard flu vaccination programs are being implemented very sparsely. Here in Massachusetts the public is angry because there are no flu clinics, due to a shortage. No one is being forced to take shots; quite to the contrary.
    I don’t believe in vaccinations, and will never have one, but my husband wants one. He went to his yearly exam last week and asked his dr. for the flu shot, and there was none to be had. In the past they were always available all through the fall to anyone who wanted them. At the moment, MA residents are clamoring for flu shots, and are furious that none are available in many communities.
    Relax, people.

    [Reply]

  6. Carol Morgan on November 2nd, 2009 12:50 pm

    Hummm…. I read both Memorandum/Abstracts and feel that the conclusion drawn in the above article may be inflammatory, in the least. I saw before me a carefully constructed research protocol that outlined results. Could some nefarious organization utilize this research for evil purposes? I suppose if their budget were big enough, but no more scary than the Australians, excitedly enthusiastic re: their Mouse Smallpox research. And no one took that and destroyed the world. I think you are overstating the dangers and although I believe we should not take vaccines until their are proven to only contain human-safe components, I don’t think we should attempt to scare the public with interpretations of obscure animal/viral research. Not unless your credentials allow you such assessments.

    [Reply]

  7. Angela Minelli on November 3rd, 2009 4:55 pm

    This is an atrocious and unthinkable reality. While I have thought for a while this was true, it’s hard to see it in print which only confirms my suspicions. This certainly does feel similar to what those under Hitler experienced, but with prettier wrapping. The deceit going on is unfathomable.

    [Reply]

  8. Kihura Nkuba on November 17th, 2009 9:53 pm

    I would suggest that we take them to court in Uganda. Victory in a small country where media is lacking information to print and broadcast would generate enough interest. Judges here might want to make a name for themselves. A suit in a Nigeria court forced one of the leading pharmaceutical companies to settle out of court. Besides the cost might not be colossal like what it would be in America. Who can join me.

    [Reply]

  9. Corner Shower Enclosure on December 30th, 2009 10:36 pm

    Thanks for posting this, lifted my day.

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply